data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b636/1b6366c35b88f901976efddcb7d52cd4b4913409" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00c32/00c3244ca73d8880ba48b0fa818b01d3d912dcc1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67241/672419abbbf783ca684b26d6fd8ed2038b56d0ff" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/116ff/116ff55d3d4c3e677a7973b7d3716ace0a479535" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b592f/b592ff4329d14662363227d30880bab8dfb2cf9e" alt=""
Brian Jungen’s work deals with issues around the commercialism in First Nations art. When I see Jungen’s work, I think of issues around pan-Indianism. Pan-Indianism is when natives are looked at as one culture rather than a large group of many cultures. Some native artists use pan-indianism to their advantage, for example a Cree or Métis carving in a Northwest coast Native art style. So my question is; is Jungen’s work using pan-Indianism to his advantage or is he exposing the western art world’s attitude of pan-Indianism when dealing with Native artists. Either way, I like the work; you can feel the spirit or soul (pun intended) of the masks, they have a presence. I have friends who are non-northwest coast carvers who do great work, so I guess if you can take the criticism you can continue to do the work. (2 carvings by Ken Humpherville)